Skip to main content
New GLP-1 protocol guide just published Read →

Liraglutide for Weight Management in Non-Diabetic Obese Adults: Dose-Finding Phase III Trial

Astrup A, Rössner S, Van Gaal L, et al.

The Lancet/2009/564 participants/20 weeks

Background

GLP-1 receptor agonists were initially developed for type 2 diabetes, but early trials revealed robust weight loss as a secondary benefit. Liraglutide, a fatty acid-acylated GLP-1 analog with a 13-hour half-life enabling once-daily dosing, was hypothesized to be effective for obesity treatment at higher doses than those used in diabetes management.

Astrup and colleagues conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III dose-finding trial to determine the optimal liraglutide dose for obesity treatment in non-diabetic adults, with orlistat (then the standard obesity pharmacotherapy) as an active comparator.

Methods

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; parallel-group with active comparator arm

Population: 564 obese but non-diabetic adults (BMI 30–40 kg/m²; mean BMI 35.6), mean age 46 years, 81% women

Arms:

  • Liraglutide 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg, 2.4 mg, or 3.0 mg subcutaneous once daily
  • Orlistat 120 mg oral three times daily
  • Placebo

Duration: 20 weeks (with dietary advice throughout)

Primary endpoint: Weight loss from baseline at 20 weeks

Key Findings

Weight Loss (Dose-Response):

TreatmentMean Weight Lossvs. Placebo
Placebo−2.8 kg
Orlistat 120 mg TID−4.1 kg−1.3 kg
Liraglutide 1.2 mg−4.8 kg−2.0 kg (p < 0.05)
Liraglutide 1.8 mg−5.5 kg−2.7 kg (p < 0.001)
Liraglutide 2.4 mg−6.3 kg−3.5 kg (p < 0.001)
Liraglutide 3.0 mg−7.2 kg−4.4 kg (p < 0.001)
  • Liraglutide 3.0 mg produced 5.8 kg more weight loss than orlistat (the standard of care comparator)
  • 76% of liraglutide 3.0 mg patients lost ≥5% body weight vs. 44% with placebo (p < 0.001)
  • 26% achieved ≥10% weight loss on liraglutide 3.0 mg vs. 7% placebo

Cardiometabolic Risk Factors:

ParameterLiraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo
Systolic BP change (mmHg)−6.8−2.6
Diastolic BP change (mmHg)−2.6−1.6
Total cholesterol change−5.2%−1.8%
Triglycerides change−15.5%−5.3%
Pre-diabetes rate1.5%7.1%
  • New-onset pre-diabetes significantly reduced (1.5% vs. 7.1% in placebo) — diabetes prevention signal

Tolerability:

  • Nausea: most common AE, 28% liraglutide 3.0 mg vs. 4% placebo; predominantly mild-moderate, transient
  • Vomiting: 8% vs. 2%
  • Discontinuation due to AEs: 7% vs. 3%
  • No pancreatitis events; lipase elevations asymptomatic in a subset

Clinical Significance

  1. Dose-response established: The clear dose-response relationship supported the selection of 3.0 mg as the Phase III obesity dose (ultimately approved as Saxenda®)
  2. Superiority over standard of care: Outperforming orlistat (then the primary pharmacological obesity treatment) at all doses above 1.2 mg established GLP-1 agonism as a superior obesity pharmacotherapy approach
  3. Cardiometabolic benefit beyond weight: Blood pressure and lipid improvements exceeded what would be expected from weight loss alone — suggesting direct GLP-1 receptor-mediated cardioprotective effects
  4. Diabetes prevention: The reduction in new pre-diabetes in the placebo-to-liraglutide comparison is consistent with direct beta-cell protective and insulin sensitivity-enhancing effects

Limitations

  • 20-week duration is insufficient to assess long-term weight maintenance or cardiometabolic event outcomes
  • Non-diabetic population only; metabolic responses in insulin-resistant or T2D patients would differ
  • Active comparator (orlistat) now largely superseded by more effective agents
  • High nausea rates at upper doses may limit real-world tolerability
  • No assessment of lean vs. fat mass changes; DEXA body composition data absent

Compounds Studied

Related Conditions

Related Studies